Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Johnson v. Colonial Pipeline Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Johnson v. Colonial Pipeline Co. Anchor | green | “to promote settlement and avoid litigation,” | 5 |
| 2 | Tanks v. Lockheed Martin Corp. | green | “review only extends to controlling questions of law,” | 3 |
| 3 | Johnson v. Colonial Pipeline Co. | green | “in order to accomplish this purpose, the claim presented must inform the responsible party with some precision of the nature and extent of the damages alleged and of the amount of monetary damages claimed.” | 3 |
| 4 | In Re DEEPWATER HORIZON | green | “presentment is a mandatory condition-precedent with respect to plaintiffs' opa claims,” | 3 |
| 5 | Denehy v. Massachusetts Port Authority | green | “at that point, the claimant simply could not have met both the presentment requirement and the statute of limitations.” | 3 |
| 6 | Denehy v. Massachusetts Port Authority | green | “55 days before the end of the three-year window to file the instant lawsuit.” | 3 |
| 7 | Denehy v. Massachusetts Port Authority | green | “statutes are to be interpreted in accordance with their 'plain and ordinary meaning,' in order to give practical effect to the beneficial goals that impelled congress to enact the law,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.