Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Stewart v. USA Custom Paint & Body Shop, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stewart v. USA Custom Paint & Body Shop, Inc. Anchor | green | “a judgment must be sufficiently definite and certain to define and protect the rights of all litigants, or it should provide a definite means of ascertaining such rights, to the end that ministerial officers can carry the judgment into execution without ascertainment of facts no…” | 8 |
| 2 | Chambers v. Pruitt | green | “district courts generally have exclusive jurisdiction to determine title to real property.” | 7 |
| 3 | Stewart v. USA Custom Paint & Body Shop, Inc. | green | “must be sufficiently definite and certain to define and protect the rights of all litigants, or it should provide a definite means of ascertaining such rights, to the end that ministerial officers can carry the judgment into execution without ascertainment of facts not therein s…” | 4 |
| 4 | Carrizales v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services | green | “issues not expressly presented to the trial court by written motion, answer or other response shall not be considered on appeal as grounds for reversal.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.