Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from California Native Plant Society v. City of Rancho Cordova.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | California Native Plant Society v. City of Rancho Cordova Anchor | green | “exhaustion of administrative remedies is a jurisdictional prerequisite to maintenance of a ceqa action.” | 5 |
| 2 | Tomlinson v. County of Alameda | green | “strong public policy of protecting the environment.” | 3 |
| 3 | California Aviation Council v. County of Amador | green | “plaintiffs must show that board failed to give the notice required by law, or that they are members of the public addressing a public wrong and no notice of the hearing was given them in any form” | 3 |
| 4 | Stand Tall on Principles v. Shasta Union High School District | green | “completion of the eir process.” | 3 |
| 5 | Mani Bros. Real Estate Group v. City of Los Angeles | green | “even where the administrative remedy may not resolve all issues or provide the precise relief requested by a plaintiff, the exhaustion doctrine is still viewed with favor 'because it facilitates the development of a complete record that draws on administrative expertise and prom…” | 3 |
| 6 | Gilroy Citizens for Responsible Planning v. City of Gilroy | green | “presume that official duty has been regularly performed.” | 3 |
| 7 | Saltonstall v. City of Sacramento | green | “ceqa provides an exception to the prohibition on commitment to a project before environmental review for purposes of land acquisition” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.