Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Caudle v. Betts.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Caudle v. Betts Anchor | green | “harmful or offensive contact with a person, resulting from an act intended to cause the plaintiff to suffer such a contact.” | 13 |
| 2 | Caudle v. Betts | green | “a harmful or offensive contact with a person, resulting from an act intended to cause the plaintiff to suffer such a contact.” | 7 |
| 3 | State v. Romero | neutral | “a finding of liability under article 667 requires either proof of personal injury or physical damage to property or proof of the presence of some type of excessive or abusive conduct.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.