Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Ramey.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Ramey Anchor | green | “an emergency situation requiring swift action to prevent imminent danger to life or serious damage to property, or to forestall the imminent escape of a suspect or destruction of evidence.” | 13 |
| 2 | Tamborino v. Superior Court | green | “was believed to be injured and bleeding.” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Bennett | green | “with few exceptions, the question whether a warrantless search of a home is reasonable and hence constitutional must be answered no.” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Ronald Frank Timmann | green | “the constitution prohibits police from forcing entry into a dwelling on the basis of a speculation that someone inside may have been injured.” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Ramey | green | “imminent danger to life or serious damage to property” | 1 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.