Topic: not invade the province of exclusive administrative fact-fi… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #17711

5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Michigan Employment Relations Commission v. Detroit Symphony Orchestra, Inc.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Michigan Employment Relations Commission v. Detroit Symphony Orchestra, Inc Anchor
mich · 1974
green “not invade the province of exclusive administrative fact-finding by displacing an agency's choice between two reasonably differing views.” 6
2 In Re Detroit Edison Co. Application
michctapp · 2007
green “payments made by edison for transmission costs . . . are necessarily 'transportation costs,' and therefore are properly recoverable in a pscr clause.” 5
3 In Re Detroit Edison Co. Application
michctapp · 2007
green “the psc's clearly erroneous decision resulted in a reduction of 46.2 million in edison's revenue requirement for 2004, and a significant reduction of hundreds of millions in the future.” 4
4 In Re Detroit Edison Co. Application
michctapp · 2007
green “none of the control premium requested by detroit edison should be included in detroit edison's rates.” 4
5 Mason County Civic Research Council v. Mason County
mich · 1955
green “must be conferred by clear and unmistakable language, since a doubtful power does not exist.” 4

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check