Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Perkins.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Perkins Anchor | green | “repeatedly held that the purpose of rule 651(c) is to ensure that counsel shapes the petitioner's claims into proper legal form and presents those claims to the court.” | 8 |
| 2 | People v. Perkins | green | “the purpose of rule 651(c) is to ensure that counsel shapes the petitioner's claims into proper legal form and presents those claims to the court.” | 8 |
| 3 | People v. Huff | green | “while a defendant is presumed innocent prior to trial, a postconviction petitioner has already been stripped of the presumption of innocence.” | 4 |
| 4 | People v. Carlisle | green | “de novo consideration means that the reviewing court performs the same analysis that a trial judge would perform.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.