Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Toby Joseph Welch v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Toby Joseph Welch v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division Anchor | green | “we have continuously affirmed that the primary objective of the implied consent statute is the removal of dangerous and intoxicated drivers from iowa's roadways in order to safeguard the traveling public.” | 5 |
| 2 | State Of Iowa Vs. Robert Joseph Vance | green | “specific and articulable facts . . . taken together with rational inferences from those facts.” | 3 |
| 3 | State v. Baird | green | “suffice it to say that lemberger does not adequately establish that article i, section 11 possesses a different meaning than the fourth amendment to the united states constitution in this context.” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Harris | green | “consent is not invalid under the fourth amendment simply because it was given in advance and in exchange for a related benefit, and this is all the implied consent law accomplishes.” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Harris | green | “in the unique context of giving consent to a search . . . in exchange for a benefit, the person cannot enjoy the benefit only then to renounce the cost, and expect to continue enjoying the benefit.” | 3 |
| 6 | Voss v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division | green | “the clear intent of these advisements is to provide a person who has been requested to submit to a chemical test a basis for evaluation and decision-making in regard to either submitting or not submitting to the test.” | 3 |
| 7 | State v. Padley | green | “we conclude that free and voluntary submission to a blood test, after receiving an advisement under the implied consent law, constitutes actual consent to a blood draw under the fourth amendment.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.