Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rose v. Rose.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rose v. Rose Anchor | green | “well-settled policy considerations favoring finality of judgments circumscribe relief under mcr 2.612(c)(1).” | 8 |
| 2 | Adler v. Dormio | green | “this court reviews a trial court's decision whether to set aside a judgment under mcr 2.612 for an abuse of discretion.” | 6 |
| 3 | Adler v. Dormio | green | “a trial court has not abused its discretion if its decision results in an outcome within the range of principled outcomes.” | 6 |
| 4 | Adler v. Dormio | green | “the interpretation of a court rule, like a matter of statutory interpretation, is a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.