Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Culbert.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Culbert Anchor | green | “our examination of the statutory language and the legislative history of the hobbs act impels us to the conclusion that congress intended to make criminal all conduct within the reach of the statutory language.” | 10 |
| 2 | United States v. Kenneth E. Hollis | green | “there is nothing in the legislative history of the hobbs act that would require an effect on commerce subsequent to, rather than contemporaneous with, the extortion.” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Julita De Parias, Jessie Ramirez, A/K/A Marzelo Romdom, A/K/A Norbey Duque Garcia and \Jessid\"" | green | “a connection with interstate commerce,” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Peter R. Farrell and Paul A. Farrell | green | “where attempted extortion or conspiracy to extort are charged, the interstate nexus may be demonstrated by evidence of potential impact on interstate commerce, or by evidence of actual, de minimis impact.” | 3 |
| 5 | Bernard F. McNely v. Ocala Star-Banner Corporation, a Florida Corporation the New York Times Company, a Foreign Corporation | green | “we must give effect to this plain language unless there is good reason to believe congress intended the language to have some more restrictive meaning.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.