Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 23 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Berry & State Farm v. Queen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Berry & State Farm v. Queen Anchor | green | “we assume that the legislature's intent is expressed in the statutory language and thus our statutory interpretation focuses primarily on the language of the statute to determine the purpose and intent of the general assembly.” | 5 |
| 2 | Lawrence v. State | green | “by declining to add a requirement of knowledge of prohibited status over the course of several decades, the general assembly has acquiesced in maryland appellate courts' interpretation of the relevant statute.” | 3 |
| 3 | Howling v. State Abongnelah v. State | green | “by declining to add a requirement of knowledge of prohibited status over the course of several decades, the general assembly has acquiesced in maryland appellate courts' interpretation of the relevant statute.” | 3 |
| 4 | Marcantonio v. Moen | green | “decreasing the chance of survival as a result of negligent treatment where the likelihood of recovery from the preexisting disease or injury, prior to any alleged negligent treatment, was improbable, i.e., 50 or less.” | 3 |
| 5 | Marcantonio v. Moen | green | “erroneously entered summary judgment on the basis that the marcantonios failed to establish sufficient evidence of proximate cause.” | 3 |
| 6 | Marcantonio v. Moen | green | “more probable than not that the defendant's negligence caused the alleged injury.” | 3 |
| 7 | Coleman v. Soccer Ass'n | green | “plainly involve major policy considerations.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.