Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 158 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Trade Finance Partners, LLC v. AAR CORP..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trade Finance Partners, LLC v. AAR CORP. Anchor | green | “inferences relying on mere speculation or conjecture will not suffice.” | 51 |
| 2 | Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and Judith Keane, Intervenor-Appellant v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. | green | “definite, competent evidence to rebut the summary judgment motion.” | 34 |
| 3 | Smith v. Hope School | green | “we are not required to draw every conceivable inference from the record . . . we draw only reasonable inferences” | 30 |
| 4 | Trade Finance Partners, LLC v. AAR CORP. | green | “inferences relying on mere speculation or conjecture will not suffice” | 17 |
| 5 | Lewis v. City of Chicago | green | “weigh evidence or engage in fact-finding,” | 16 |
| 6 | Andre Johnson v. Donald T. Snyder, Eugene McAdory Assistant Warden, Pam Grubman | green | “so obvious that even a lay person would easily recognize the necessity for a doctor's attention.” | 6 |
| 7 | Thomas v. Walton | green | “deliberate indifference implies at a minimum actual knowledge of impending harm easily preventable, so that a conscious, culpable refusal to prevent harm can be inferred from the defendant's failure to prevent it.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.