Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Terry L. Wood.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Terry L. Wood Anchor | green | “it is certainly not uncommon for most citizens-whether innocent or guilty-to exhibit signs of nervousness when confronted by a law enforcement officer.” | 7 |
| 2 | United States v. Terry L. Wood | green | “although the nature of the totality of the circumstances test makes it possible for individually innocuous factors to add up to reasonable suspicion, it is 'impossible for a combination of wholly innocent factors to combine into a suspicious conglomeration unless there are concr…” | 5 |
| 3 | United States v. Shareef | green | “reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place.” | 4 |
| 4 | United States v. McRae | green | “an objectively reasonable and articulable suspicion that illegal activity has occurred or is occurring” | 3 |
| 5 | United States v. Robert L. | green | “of a particular make or model that has been expressly linked to drug trafficking,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.