Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Speech First, Inc. v. Mark Schlissel.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Speech First, Inc. v. Mark Schlissel Anchor | green | “the response team's ability to make referrals-i.e., to inform the office of student conflict resolution or the police about reported conduct-is a real consequence that objectively chills speech.” | 4 |
| 2 | National Federation of the Blind of Texas, Inc. v. Abbott | green | “the stipulated facts were silent” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Victor B. Atkins | green | “evidence in the record that the person making a statement . . . has control over whether the university will reimplement the challenged definitions.” | 3 |
| 4 | Brian Majors v. Marsha Abell | green | “need not show that the authorities have threatened to prosecute him . . . ; the threat is latent in the existence of the statute.” | 3 |
| 5 | Arizona Right to Life Political Action Committee v. Betsy Bayless Janet Napolitano, in Her Official Capacity as the Arizona Attorney General | green | “and so may deter constitutionally protected expression . . . , there is standing” | 3 |
| 6 | Blum v. Holder | green | “clapper does not call into question the assumption that the state will enforce its own non-moribund criminal laws, absent evidence to the contrary.” | 3 |
| 7 | Freedom Path, Inc. v. Internal Revenue Serv. | green | “as the district court noted, 'the first amendment challenge has unique standing issues because of the chilling effect, self- censorship, and in fact the very special nature of political speech itself.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.