Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Penton Industrial Publishing Company, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Penton Industrial Publishing Company, Inc. Anchor | green | “the preponderance of the evidence must establish that some form of intentional discrimination against the class of which plaintiff was a member was the company's standing operating procedure.” | 7 |
| 2 | Dixon v. Anderson | green | “in determining when the cause of action accrues in section 1983 actions, we have looked to what event should have alerted the typical lay person to protect his or her rights.” | 7 |
| 3 | Dixon v. Anderson | green | “what event should have alerted the typical lay person to protect his or her rights.” | 4 |
| 4 | Richard Haithcock v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General | green | “appellant must demonstrate something more than the existence of discriminatory treatment in his case.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.