Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Pamela MORALES, Guardian of Gary Thompson; Bank of the Bluegrass and Trust Co., Conservator of Gary Thompson v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.; Honda Motor Co., Ltd.; Honda R&D Co., Ltd.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pamela MORALES, Guardian of Gary Thompson; Bank of the Bluegrass and Trust Co., Conservator of Gary Thompson v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.; Honda Motor Co., Ltd.; Honda R&D Co., Ltd Anchor | green | “even if a mistake has been made regarding the admission or exclusion of evidence, a new trial will not be granted unless the evidence would have caused a different outcome at trial.” | 15 |
| 2 | Tompkin v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. | green | “this court reviews a district court's evidentiary rulings for abuse of discretion, and a district court's determination will be reversed only if the abuse of discretion caused more than harmless error.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.