Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 155 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Smith v. Phillips.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smith v. Phillips Anchor | green | “due process means a jury capable and willing to decide the case solely on the evidence before it, and a trial judge ever watchful to prevent prejudicial occurrences and to determine the effect of such occurrences when they happen.” | 56 |
| 2 | McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood | green | “a correct response would have provided a valid basis for a challenge for cause.” | 35 |
| 3 | McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood | green | “a party must first demonstrate that a juror failed to answer honestly a material question on voir dire, and then further show that a correct response would have provided a valid basis for a challenge for cause.” | 33 |
| 4 | McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood | green | “the motives for concealing information may vary, but only those reasons that affect a juror's impartiality can truly be said to affect the fairness of a trial.” | 31 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.