Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Anchor | green | “the puc and this court have duly recognized the federal preemption of the subject matter of state and local assessment of charges against amtrak for repair or replacement of railroad crossings.” | 4 |
| 2 | Witkowski v. Welch | green | “a final judgment on the merits by a court of competent jurisdiction will prevent any relitigation of issues that involve the same parties and the same cause of action” | 3 |
| 3 | National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission | green | “was necessary to the outcome of the proceeding,” | 3 |
| 4 | Greater North American Funding Corp. v. Tara Enterprises, Inc. | green | “a final judgment on the merits by a court of competent jurisdiction will prevent any relitigation of issues that involve the same parties and the same cause of action” | 3 |
| 5 | Southeastern Penn. Transp. v. Penn. Pub. Util. | green | “from seeking to enforce any puc order assessing costs to amtrak with respect to the lloyd street bridge.” | 3 |
| 6 | Southeastern Penn. Transp. v. Penn. Pub. Util. | green | “must treat amtrak's motion for declaratory and injunctive relief as one for preliminary injunctive relief.” | 3 |
| 7 | Southeastern Penn. Transp. v. Penn. Pub. Util. | green | “puc's position is an unnecessarily narrow application of standing doctrine.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.