Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Beverly Coleman v. Milwaukee Board of School Directors.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beverly Coleman v. Milwaukee Board of School Directors Anchor | green | “good cause means a valid reason for delay, such as the defendant's evading service.” | 9 |
| 2 | United States v. Ligas | green | “a district court may not exercise personal jurisdiction over a defendant unless the defendant has been properly served with process, and the service requirement is not satisfied merely because the defendant is aware that he has been named in a lawsuit or has received a copy of t…” | 9 |
| 3 | Beverly Coleman v. Milwaukee Board of School Directors | green | “valid reason for delay, such as the defendant's evading service.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.