Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Michelle Faye McIntosh.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Michelle Faye McIntosh Anchor | green | “jurisdiction continues until extinguished by some event.” | 4 |
| 2 | State v. Wersland | green | “the district court lacked jurisdiction” | 3 |
| 3 | State v. Bottens | green | “the prohibition of successive motions under rule 35 is a jurisdictional limit” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Castro | green | “where the lower court's decision turns on the interpretation of a criminal rule, this court exercises free review.” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Dobbs | green | “the paramount goal of sentencing is the 'good order and protection of society.” | 3 |
| 6 | Richardson v. Ruddy | green | “not properly typed 'jurisdictional.” | 3 |
| 7 | State v. Mosqueda | green | “where an appeal is taken from the denial of a rule 35 motion, as in this case, we review all information presented at the original sentencing hearing and at a later hearing on the motion.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.