2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Berger v. Astrue.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Berger v. Astrue Anchor | green | “when an alj recommends that the agency deny benefits, it must first 'build an accurate and logical bridge from the evidence to the conclusion.” | 13 |
| 2 | Gildon, Jacqueline v. Astrue, Michael | green | “an alj is not required to accept a doctor's opinion if it "is brief, conclusory, and inadequately supported by clinical findings.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.