Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Michael Scott v. First S. Nat'l Bank.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Michael Scott v. First S. Nat'l Bank Anchor | green | “under the fcra, those who furnish information to consumer reporting agencies have two obligations: (1) to provide accurate information; and (2) to undertake an investigation upon receipt of a notice of dispute regarding credit information that is furnished.” | 7 |
| 2 | Nelski v. Trans Union, LLC | green | “(1) the defendant reported inaccurate information about the plaintiff; (2) the defendant either negligently or willfully failed to follow reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information about the plaintiff; (3) the plaintiff was injured; and (4) the …” | 6 |
| 3 | Frank Boggio v. USAA Federal Savings Bank | green | “exists 'to ensure fair and accurate credit reporting, promote efficiency in the banking system, and protect consumer privacy.” | 3 |
| 4 | Christopher Twumasi-Ankrah v. Checkr, Inc. | green | “(1) the defendant reported inaccurate information about the plaintiff; (2) the defendant either negligently or willfully failed to follow reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information about the plaintiff; (3) the plaintiff was injured; and (4) the …” | 3 |
| 5 | Christopher Twumasi-Ankrah v. Checkr, Inc. | green | “misleading in such a way and to such an extent that it could have been expected to have an adverse effect on the consumer.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.