Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Republic Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Mex-Tex, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Republic Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Mex-Tex, Inc. Anchor | green | “to construe the rules of appellate procedure reasonably, yet liberally, so that the right to appeal is not lost by imposing requirements not absolutely necessary to effect the purpose of a rule.” | 8 |
| 2 | City of Arlington v. State Farm Lloyds | green | “contains all points of error relied upon, argument and authorities under each point of error, and all facts relied upon for the appeal with references to the pages in the record where those facts can be found.” | 5 |
| 3 | Republic Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Mex-Tex, Inc. | green | “construe the rules of appellate procedure reasonably, yet liberally, so that the right to appeal is not lost by imposing requirements not absolutely necessary to effect the purpose of a rule.” | 5 |
| 4 | Abdelnour v. Mid National Holdings, Inc. | green | “parties asserting error on appeal still must put forth some specific argument and analysis showing that the record and the law supports their contentions” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.