Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from CHRISTIAN v. CHRISTIAN.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CHRISTIAN v. CHRISTIAN Anchor | green | “when this court is faced with a question of statutory interpretation, we apply a de novo standard of review” | 4 |
| 2 | Maras v. Smith | green | “there are many previous holdings of this court that a presumption exists on appeal from a non-jury case that the trial court disregarded all incompetent evidence in rendering its judgment, unless the contrary clearly appears.” | 3 |
| 3 | Chamberlin v. Chamberlin | green | “the burden is upon the party appealing from the custody and visitation award to show that the trial court's decision is erroneous and contrary to the child's best interests.” | 3 |
| 4 | Rowe v. Rowe | green | “in a case of equitable cognizance the judgment of the trial court carries with it a finding of all facts necessary to support it, which could have been found from the evidence, and the judgment will not be set aside unless clearly against the weight of the evidence.” | 3 |
| 5 | Kelley v. Kelley | green | “overturned that part of â 107.3(a)(2)(e) that provided that the guardian ad litem is not subject to discovery pursuant to the oklahoma discovery code” | 3 |
| 6 | TUCKER v. THE COCHRAN FIRM-CRIMINAL DEFENSE BIRMINGHAM L.L.C. | green | “a trial court's record constitutes the only means for communication of its proceedings to an appellate court.” | 3 |
| 7 | BOYLE v. ASAP ENERGY, INC. | green | “for reversal, there must be prejudice as well as the evidence being incompetent” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.