Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Andrade v. NAACP of Austin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Andrade v. NAACP of Austin Anchor | green | “because the voters seek only declaratory and injunctive relief, and because each voter seeks the same relief, only one plaintiff with standing is required.” | 5 |
| 2 | Mitz v. TEXAS STATE BD. OF VET. MED. EXAM. | green | “hardship is shown when a statute 'requires an immediate and significant change in the plaintiffs' conduct of their affairs with serious penalties attached to noncompliance.” | 4 |
| 3 | State v. Richards | green | “room for a fair difference of opinion as to the necessity and reasonableness” | 4 |
| 4 | Friends of Canyon Lake, Inc. v. Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority | green | “the state agency must be made a party to the action.” | 3 |
| 5 | Trinity River Authority v. URS Consultants, Inc. | green | “sufficiently rational and reasonable to meet constitutional due course requirements.” | 3 |
| 6 | Mabee v. McDonald | green | “in nearly if not all respects, practically synonymous,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.