Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State of Tennessee v. Courtney Bishop.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State of Tennessee v. Courtney Bishop Anchor | green | “modified trustworthiness standard” | 10 |
| 2 | State v. Bohanan | green | “when the instructions given by the trial judge are a correct statement of the law, and the instructions fully and fairly set forth the applicable law, it is not error for a trial judge to refuse to give a special instruction requested by a party.” | 6 |
| 3 | State v. Small | green | “may consult counsel for guidance and advice, but otherwise handles the defense of the case on his or her own.” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Willis | green | “egregiously manipulative and abusive of the judicial process.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.