Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Co. v. Hiner.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Co. v. Hiner Anchor | green | “once such a showing is made, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to come forward with admissible evidence to establish each required element of the claim.” | 4 |
| 2 | Rademaker v. E. D. Flynn Export Co. | green | “was served with the motion to amend and notified of the fact that the motion had been filed, all prior to the expiration of the seven-year repose period” | 3 |
| 3 | Longo v. Pennsylvania Electric Co. | green | “the district court signed an order permitting such amendment on november 2, 1983; and on this same day, the amended complaint was filed by the plaintiff.” | 3 |
| 4 | Romero v. Bachicha | green | “the real inquiry when an amendment changes the name of a party is whether the newly identified or added party had adequate notice of the institution of the action and knew, or should have known, that but for the mistake, the action would have been brought against it.” | 3 |
| 5 | Slusser v. Vantage Builders, Inc. | green | “equitable tolling is a nonstatutory tolling theory which suspends a limitations period.” | 3 |
| 6 | Slusser v. Vantage Builders, Inc. | green | “new mexico directly recognizes the distinct legal theory of equitable tolling.” | 3 |
| 7 | Slusser v. Vantage Builders, Inc. | green | “we determine the applicability of equitable tolling on a case-by-case basis, with an eye toward cases where a litigant was prevented from filing suit because of an extraordinary event beyond his or her control.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.