Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mississippi Dept. of Public Safety v. Durn.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mississippi Dept. of Public Safety v. Durn Anchor | green | “when the 'conduct involved evinced not only some appreciation of the unreasonable risk involved, but also a deliberate disregard of that risk and the high probability of harm involved.” | 5 |
| 2 | City of Ellisville v. Richardson | green | “although reasonable minds might differ on the conclusion of whether or not the officer in question acted in reckless disregard, it is beyond this court's power to disturb the findings of the trial judge if supported by substantial evidence.” | 5 |
| 3 | City of Jackson v. Sandifer | green | “a circuit court judge sitting without a jury is afforded the same deference as a chancellor.” | 5 |
| 4 | City of Jackson v. Law | green | “are safe on appeal where they are supported by substantial, credible, and reasonable evidence.” | 4 |
| 5 | City of Jackson v. Sandifer | green | “are manifestly wrong, clearly erroneous, or an erroneous legal standard was applied.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.