Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mosher v. Department of Inspections & Appeals, Health Facilities Division.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mosher v. Department of Inspections & Appeals, Health Facilities Division Anchor | green | “the agency decision itself is reviewed under the standards set forth in section 17a.19(10).” | 9 |
| 2 | State v. Bower | green | “an interpretation that is reasonable, best achieves the statute's purpose, and avoids absurd results.” | 8 |
| 3 | Beier Glass Co. v. Brundige | green | “to determine and effectuate the intent of the legislature.” | 3 |
| 4 | Beier Glass Co. v. Brundige | green | “ultimate goal is to determine and effectuate the intent of the legislature.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.