Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Carter-Hubbard Publishing Co. v. WRMC Hospital Operating Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carter-Hubbard Publishing Co. v. WRMC Hospital Operating Corp. Anchor | green | “exceptions and exemptions to the public records act must be construed narrowly.” | 8 |
| 2 | Times-News Publishing Company, Inc. v. State | green | “unless either the agency or the record is specifically exempted from the statute's mandate.” | 4 |
| 3 | Times-News Publishing Company, Inc. v. State | green | “affords the public a broad right of access to records in the possession of public agencies and their officials.” | 4 |
| 4 | Knight Publishing Co. v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority | green | “liberal access to public records.” | 3 |
| 5 | State Ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Power & Light Co. | green | “a reviewing court confronting this question begins its analysis with a presumption against federal preemption.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.