Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Nelson v. Freeland.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nelson v. Freeland Anchor | green | “duty to exercise reasonable care in the maintenance of their premises for the protection of lawful visitors.” | 11 |
| 2 | Nelson v. Freeland | green | “the duty to exercise reasonable care in the maintenance of their premises for the protection of lawful visitors.” | 6 |
| 3 | Ragland v. Moore | green | “it is only in exceptional negligence cases that summary judgment is appropriate, since the standard of reasonable care should ordinarily be applied by the jury under appropriate instructions from the court.” | 4 |
| 4 | Nelson v. Freeland | green | “we impose upon owners and occupiers of land only the duty to exercise reasonable care in the maintenance of their premises for the protection of lawful visitors.” | 1 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.