Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lybbert v. Grant County.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lybbert v. Grant County Anchor | green | “a court may grant summary judgment if the pleadings, affidavits, and depositions establish that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 12 |
| 2 | Lamon v. McDonnell Douglas Corp. | green | “fact upon which the outcome of the litigation depends, in whole or in part.” | 5 |
| 3 | SentinelC3, Inc. v. Hunt | green | “engaging in the same inquiry as the trial court.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.