Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Swinney.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Swinney Anchor | green | “when an issue involving the statute of limitations has been tried, we review the record to determine whether substantial evidence supports the findings of the trier of fact.” | 4 |
| 2 | People v. Dehle | green | “restitution hearings held pursuant to penal code section 1202.4 are sentencing hearings and are thus hearings which are a significant part of a criminal prosecution.” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Akins | green | “state and federal regulations that require an agency to calculate the amount of overpayment according to a different method” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Whisenhunt | green | “the standard applied by the trial court under penal code section 1118.1 in ruling on a motion for judgment of acquittal is the same as the standard applied by an appellate court in reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction.” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Mozes | green | “means engaging in at least two felonies that have the same or similar purpose, result, principals, victims, or methods of commission, or are otherwise interrelated by distinguishing characteristics, and that are not isolated events.” | 3 |
| 6 | People v. Garcia | green | “the trial court is not required to order restitution equal to the exact amount of the loss, but it must employ a rational method that makes the victim reasonably whole.” | 3 |
| 7 | People v. Lockwood | green | “what was not done is to take what we know was the truth, go back to whatever period of time there was, and for somebody to fill in and find out who those workers were, assign . . . whatever modification factor it was, and determine what the premium is.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.