Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Spears v. The Association of Illinois Electric Cooperatives.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Spears v. The Association of Illinois Electric Cooperatives Anchor | green | “the scope of review in an interlocutory appeal brought under rule 308 is limited to the certified question.” | 4 |
| 2 | Illinois Native American Bar Ass'n v. University of Illinois | green | “is aware of all previous enactments.” | 3 |
| 3 | Biekert v. Maram | green | “state participation in the medicaid program is voluntary, but if a state elects to participate, it must comply with the requirements of the medicaid act and the regulations promulgated thereunder.” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Chapman | green | “foster effective self-policing by members of the medical profession in matters unique to that profession and to thereby promote the legitimate state interest in improving the quality of health care in illinois.” | 3 |
| 5 | Tjaden v. State of Illinois | neutral | “at its heart, medicaid is a taxpayer-funded program intended to provide medical care to the truly poor and needy .” | 3 |
| 6 | Spears v. The Association of Illinois Electric Cooperatives | green | “a certified question pursuant to rule 308 is reviewed de novo.” | 3 |
| 7 | Frigo v. Silver Cross Hospital | green | “limitations on the remedies available to physicians aggrieved by a hospital's peer-review process.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.