Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Morrison v. Com., Dept. of Pub. Welfare.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morrison v. Com., Dept. of Pub. Welfare Anchor | green | “where the record adequately supports the trial court's reasons and factual basis, the court did not abuse its discretion.” | 9 |
| 2 | Morrison v. Com., Dept. of Pub. Welfare | green | “where the trial court articulates a single mistake (or a finite set of mistakes), the appellate court's review is limited in scope to the stated reason, and the appellate court must review that reason under the appropriate standard.” | 5 |
| 3 | Coker v. SM Flickinger Co., Inc. | green | “discretion must be exercised on the foundation of reason.” | 4 |
| 4 | Rettger v. UPMC SHADYSIDE | green | “where the record adequately supports the trial court's reasons and factual basis, the court did not abuse its discretion.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.