2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Burch v. Dist. Ct..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Burch v. Dist. Ct. Anchor | green | “generally, both procedural and substantive unconscionability must be present in order for a court to exercise its discretion to refuse to enforce a contract or clause as unconscionable.” | 8 |
| 2 | Burch v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada | green | “generally, both procedural and substantive unconscionability must be present in order for a court to exercise its discretion to refuse to enforce a contract or clause as unconscionable.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.