Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Carrino v. Novotny.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carrino v. Novotny Anchor | green | “impregnable unless so distorted and wrong, in the objective and articulated view of a judge, as to manifest with utmost certainty a plain miscarriage of justice.” | 8 |
| 2 | Doe v. Arts | green | “impregnable unless so distorted and wrong, in the objective and articulated view of a judge, as to manifest with utmost certainty a plain miscarriage of justice.” | 6 |
| 3 | State v. Bey | green | “viewed in the context of the entire record.” | 4 |
| 4 | Bender v. Adelson | green | “are so prejudicial that 'it clearly and convincingly appears that there was a miscarriage of justice under the law.” | 2 |
| 5 | Carrino v. Novotny | green | “a jury verdict, from the weight of evidence standpoint, is impregnable unless so distorted and wrong, in the objective and articulated view of a judge, as to manifest with utmost certainty a plain miscarriage of justice.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.