Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Reichert v. COURT OF CLAIMS OF STATE.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reichert v. COURT OF CLAIMS OF STATE Anchor | green | “the purpose of certiorari review is to have the entire record of the inferior tribunal brought before the court to determine, from the record alone, whether the tribunal proceeded according to applicable law.” | 7 |
| 2 | Reichert v. COURT OF CLAIMS OF STATE | green | “certiorari may not be used to review the correctness of a decision by the court of claims based upon the merits of the case before it.” | 5 |
| 3 | Reichert v. COURT OF CLAIMS OF STATE | green | “may not be used to review the correctness of a decision by the court of claims based upon the merits of the case before it.” | 5 |
| 4 | People v. Philip Morris, Inc. | green | “to receive and resolve claims against the state.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.