Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kaplan v. Lebanese Canadian Bank.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kaplan v. Lebanese Canadian Bank Anchor | green | “must accept as true all nonconclusory factual allegations in the complaint and draw all reasonable inferences in the plaintiffs' favor.” | 17 |
| 2 | Taylor Theunissen, M.D., LLC v. United Healthcare Grp., Inc. | green | “role in reviewing a motion to dismiss under rule 12(b)(6) is to determine if the complaint -- apart from any of its conclusory allegations -- alleges enough facts to state a plausible claim for relief.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.