Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 151 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from McNeil v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McNeil v. United States Anchor | green | “the ftca bars claimants from bringing suit in federal court until they have exhausted their administrative remedies.” | 125 |
| 2 | Sloan, Leon Sr. v. HUD | green | “grants federal district courts jurisdiction over claims arising from certain torts committed by federal employees in the scope of their employment, and waives the government's sovereign immunity from such claims.” | 15 |
| 3 | Gaf Corporation v. United States of America. Keene Corporation v. United States of America. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. United States | green | “allows the agency to investigate and assess the strength of the claim and make an informed decision whether to attempt settlement negotiations.” | 4 |
| 4 | White-Squire v. United States Postal Service | green | “consent to be sued must be 'unequivocally expressed,' and the terms of such consent define the court's subject matter jurisdiction.” | 4 |
| 5 | Sean T. Haddon v. United States | green | “of the same general nature as that authorized” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.