Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com. Anchor | neutral | “specific safety requirements are ' "intended to protect employees against their own negligence and folly as well as to provide them a safe place to work.” | 5 |
| 2 | Zarbana Indus., Inc. v. Hayes | neutral | “reflects this constitutional provision of authority and addresses vssr violations.” | 5 |
| 3 | State ex rel. G & S Metal Products, Inc. v. Moore | green | “must 'forewarn the employer and establish a standard which the employer may follow.” | 5 |
| 4 | State Ex Rel. Scott v. Industrial Commission | green | “because a vssr award is a penalty, a specific safety requirement must be strictly construed and all reasonable doubts concerning the interpretation must be resolved in favor of the employer.” | 4 |
| 5 | State ex rel. Trydle v. Industrial Commission | green | “a 'specific requirement' is more than a general course of conduct or general duty or obligation flowing from the employer-employee relationship; rather, it 'embraces such lawful, specific and definite requirements or standards of conduct that are of a character plainly to app…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.