Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 151 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Zalaski v. City of Bridgeport Police Department.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zalaski v. City of Bridgeport Police Department Anchor | green | “establishing the absence of any genuine issue of material fact” | 41 |
| 2 | Zalaski v. City of Bridgeport Police Department | green | “the moving party bears the burden of establishing the absence of any genuine issue of material fact.” | 30 |
| 3 | Inbal Hayut v. State University Of New York | green | “there must be evidence on which the jury could reasonably find for the non-movant.” | 23 |
| 4 | Inbal Hayut v. State University Of New York | green | “the mere existence of a scintilla of evidence in support of the non-movant's position will be insufficient; there must be evidence on which the jury could reasonably find for the non-movant.” | 20 |
| 5 | Inbal Hayut v. State University Of New York | green | “there must be evidence on which the jury could reasonably find for the non- movant.” | 19 |
| 6 | Risco v. McHugh | green | “improperly interjects arguments and/or immaterial facts in response to facts asserted by the opposing party without specifically controverting those facts,” | 18 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.