Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Brown.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Brown Anchor | green | “there was no reasonable view of the evidence that there was any conspiracy narrower in scope than the single conspiracy charged in the indictment” | 4 |
| 2 | People v. Gissendanner | green | “a separate, police-initiated, identification procedure, such as a lineup, showup or photographic array, which takes place subsequent to the observation forming the basis for the witness's trial testimony and prior to the trial” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Butler | green | “where the eyewitness has not previously made any out-of-court, police-initiated identification of the defendant in connection with that crime” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Coleman | green | “was balanced and neutral in tone, and . . . did not urge any dissenting jurors to abandon their convictions and acquiesce in the opinion of the other jurors, attempt to coerce or compel the jurors to reach a particular verdict, or shame the jurors into reaching a verdict” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Peterson | green | “a failure to appreciate this fundamental purpose, and, particularly, the distinction between an observation and an identification procedure, may result in the erroneous invocation of cpl 710.30 (1) (b) any time a witness sees a defendant on more than one occasion prior to trial” | 3 |
| 6 | People v. Brown | green | “the nature and progress of the investigation and the difficulties inherent in the use of normal law enforcement methods” | 3 |
| 7 | People v. Ferguson | green | “minor discrepancies or misstatements do not amount to egregious inaccuracies affecting a probable cause determination” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.