Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Carroll v. Comm'r.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carroll v. Comm'r Anchor | green | “is not absolutely entitled to a proportionate share of the proceeds” | 5 |
| 2 | Comm'r | green | “the conservation purpose can nonetheless be treated as protected in perpetuity if the restrictions are extinguished by judicial proceeding” | 5 |
| 3 | Carroll v. Comm'r | green | “at least equal to the proportionate value that the perpetual conservation restriction at the time of the gift, bears to the value - 10 - of the property as a whole at that time.” | 4 |
| 4 | Hewitt v. Comm'r | green | “all that is reasonably possible,” | 4 |
| 5 | Oakbrook Land Holdings, LLC, William Duane Horton, Tax Matters Partner v. Commissioner | green | “the 'tra- ditional tools of construction' led us to hold that the commissioner's construc- tion of the regulation is correct even if we look at the question de novo.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.