Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 22 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kiely v. Graves.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kiely v. Graves Anchor | green | “property is often analogized to a bundle of sticks representing the right to use, possess, exclude, alienate, etc.” | 5 |
| 2 | Lowe v. Rowe | green | “control over the land is part of the bundle of sticks associated with land ownership and use.” | 5 |
| 3 | In re the Welfare of C.B. | green | “that termination of parental rights is necessary to prevent harm or the risk of harm to children, rcw 13.34.180 and .190” | 4 |
| 4 | In re the Welfare of C.B. | green | “the opportunity to each parent to pursue a less restrictive alternative that the state must first encourage and offer before it seeks to terminate parental rights.” | 4 |
| 5 | In re the Welfare of C.B. | green | “these arguments ignore the fundamental holding of our prior decisions that rcw 13.34.180 and .190 do not violate due process under a strict scrutiny analysis because the court” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.