Topic: we are 'not to substitute our judgment for that of the agen… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #19044

2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bloch, Felix S. v. Powell, Colin L..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Bloch, Felix S. v. Powell, Colin L. Anchor
cadc · 2003
green “we are 'not to substitute our judgment for that of the agency' but must 'consider whether the decision was based on a consideration of the relevant factors and whether there has been a clear error of judgment.” 13
2 Holy Land Foundation for Relief & Development v. Ashcroft
cadc · 2003
green “summary judgment is an appropriate procedure for resolving a challenge to a federal agency's administrative decision when review is based upon the administrative record.” 8

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check