Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Philecia Barnes v. City of Cincinnati.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Philecia Barnes v. City of Cincinnati Anchor | green | “judgment as a matter of law may only be granted if, when viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the non-moving party, giving that party the benefit of all reasonable inferences, there is no genuine issue of material fact for the jury, and reasonable minds could come t…” | 9 |
| 2 | In Re ICON Health and Fitness, Inc. | green | “we do not ignore the modifications that one skilled in the art would make to a device borrowed from the prior art.” | 6 |
| 3 | American and Foreign Insurance Company v. Bolt | green | “is not available at anyone's request on an issue not brought before the court prior to submission of the case to the jury.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.