Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Banuelos-Romero.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Banuelos-Romero Anchor | green | “trustworthy facts and circumstances within the officer's knowledge that would cause a reasonably prudent man to believe the car contains contraband.” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Richard Edward Andrews | green | “any misrepresentation by the government is a factor to be considered in evaluating” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Richard Edward Andrews | green | “had been connected to various robberies in which a sawed-off shotgun was employed.” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Richard Edward Andrews | green | “the mere utilization of words by officers that would reasonably be considered to be a command or order does not preclude the possibility of a suspect validly consenting to a search,” | 3 |
| 5 | United States v. Bobby Joe Yeagin | green | “entered no factual findings and indicated no legal theory underlying its decision to admit the evidence obtained in the consent search,” | 3 |
| 6 | United States v. Christopher Williams | green | “that it actually weighed the evidence bearing on the facts needed to answer them.” | 3 |
| 7 | United States v. John Steven Reed | green | “one of those exceptions is that a warrantless search of an automobile with probable cause is justified where circumstances make a warranted search impracticable.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.