Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gupta v. Florida Board of Regents.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gupta v. Florida Board of Regents Anchor | green | “an adverse employment action is an ultimate employment decision, such as discharge or failure to hire, or other conduct that alters the employee's compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, deprives him or her of employment opportunities, or adversely affects …” | 13 |
| 2 | Tonya J. WIDEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellee | green | “threshold level of substantiality” | 5 |
| 3 | Wu v. Thomas | green | “we do not doubt that there is some threshold level of substantiality that must be met for unlawful discrimination to be cognizable” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.