Topic: the court must give it effect and should not look to extrin… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #19107

6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 21 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Anna Robinson v. Cynthia Hagan.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Anna Robinson v. Cynthia Hagan Anchor
ca7 · 2016
green “the court must give it effect and should not look to extrinsic aids for construction.” 5
2 Harry Carmichael and Louise Carmichael v. The Payment Center, Inc.
ca7 · 2003
green “a statute and its implementing regulations should be read as a whole and, where possible, afforded a harmonious interpretation.” 4
3 Ralph Stroup v. Jo Ane B. Barnhart
ca11 · 2003
green “double dipping' that accrued to workers who split their careers between employment taxed for social security no. 192099 13 benefits ('covered') and employment exempt from social se curity taxes ('noncovered')” 3
4 Suzan Gienapp v. Harbor Crest
ca7 · 2014
green “our job is to enforce the text on the books, not to add or subtract qualifiers that a litigant thinks would make the stat ute more sensible.” 3
5 Ory Eshel v. Commissioner of IRS
cadc · 2016
green “workers in the united states are taxed to support the payment of social security benefits to the retired ... .” 3
6 Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. United States Department of Transportation
ca7 · 2016
green “we interpret statutes as a symmetrical and coherent reg ulatory scheme, and fit, if possible, all parts in an harmonious whole.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check